{¿Quiere que lo lleve a su lugar de votación?}{¿Quiere un paseo?}

Click here
Rideshare 2 Vote logo image.

U.S. House California District 25 (Riverside County Cathedral City 92234)

Carreras electorales federales

Representative, U.S. House California District 25

Elija UnoFederal  

U.S. Senate California

Elija UnoFederal  

Esta contienda es para el término completo de 6 años para el escaño de Senador de los Estados Unidos.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023


Respaldado por

U.S. Senate California - Special

Elija UnoFederal  

Esta es una contienda para completar el resto del mandato de Senador que la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris dejó vacante

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This is to fill the balance of V.P. Harris' vacated seat until 1/2023


Respaldado por

Carreras electorales estatales

Governor of California

Elija UnoEstatal  

Lieutenant Governor of California

Elija UnoEstatal  

Attorney General of California

Elija UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Rob Bonta (Titular)


Respaldado por

California Secretary of State

Elija UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Shirley Weber (Titular)


Respaldado por

California Treasurer

Elija UnoEstatal  

California Controller

Elija UnoEstatal  

California Superintendent of Public Instruction

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Estatal  

California State Board of Equalization District 4

Elija UnoEstatal  

California Commissioner of Insurance

Elija UnoEstatal  

California State Assembly District 47

Elija UnoEstatal  

Elección de juezas/jueces

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Joshua Groban (Titular)

Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.


Respaldado por

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Goodwin Liu (Titular)

Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 1 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Judith McConnell (Titular)

McConnell was appointed to the court by Gov. Gray Davis (D) in 2001 and retained by voters in 2010. She is the presiding justice.


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Manuel Ramirez (Titular)

Ramirez was appointed to the court by Gov. George Deukmejian (R) in 1990 and was retained by voters in 2010.


No

Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Carol D. Codrington (Titular)

Codrington was appointed to the court by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) in 2010 and was retained by voters for a 12-year term.


No

Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Michael J. Raphael (Titular)

Raphael was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. He received an exceptionally well qualified rating from the Judicial Nominees Evaluation Commission.


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Frank J. Menetrez (Titular)

Menetrez was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. He was rated exceptionally well qualified by the state bar Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Kathleen O'Leary (Titular)

O'Leary was appointed to the court by Gov. Gray Davis (D) in 2000. She was rated exceptionally well qualified by the state bar Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

William Bedsworth (Titular)

Bedsworth was appointed to the court by Gov. Pete Wilson (R) in 1997. The Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation of the state Bar rated him exceptionally well qualified.


No

Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Eileen Moore (Titular)

Moore was appointed to the court by Gov. Gray Davis (D) in 2000. She was retained by voters in 2002 and 2010.


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 1 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Truc Do (Titular)

Do was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2020.


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Maurice Sanchez (Titular)

Sanchez was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021. He was rated exceptionally well qualified for the position by the Commission of the California State Bar on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.


Respaldado por

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Joanne Motoike (Titular)

Motoike was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022. She was rated exceptionally well qualified for the position by the Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation of the State Bar of California.


Respaldado por

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 1 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Martin Buchanan (Titular)

Buchanan was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.


Respaldado por

Carreras electorales locales

Riverside County Board of Supervisors District 5

 No ha elegido ningún candidato

Riverside County Auditor-Controller

 No ha elegido ningún candidato

Superior Court of Riverside County, Office 4

 No ha elegido ningún candidato

Medidas y Proposiciones

California Estado Propuestas incluídas en la boleta

Proposition 1California Proposition 1: California Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives.
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution.
Proposition 26California Proposition 26: Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 27California Proposition 27: Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 28California Proposition 28: Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
  • require an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98;
  • distribute a portion of the additional funding based on a local education agency's share of economically disadvantaged students; and
  • require schools with 500 or more students to use 80% of the funding for employing teachers and 20% to training and materials.
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98.
"No" Recomendado por
Proposition 29California Proposition 29: Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"sin opinión"
Proposition 30California Proposition 30: Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 31California Proposition 31: California Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)

A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. 
"No" Recomendado por
"sin opinión"
Ir arriba

Y¡Su voto importa!