Federal Races

Representative, U.S. House California District 12

Choose OneFederal  

(Dem)Barbara Lee (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

U.S. Senate California

Choose OneFederal  

This race is for the next full, six-year term for the U.S Senate seat.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Incumbent)

This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023


Endorsed by

U.S. Senate California - Special

Choose OneFederal  

This special race is for the remainder of the term to fill VP Kamala Harris's vacated Senate seat.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Incumbent)

This is to fill the balance of V.P. Harris' vacated seat until 1/2023


Endorsed by

State Races

Governor of California

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Gavin Newsom (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Lieutenant Governor of California

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Eleni Kounalakis (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Attorney General of California

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Rob Bonta (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Secretary of State

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Shirley Weber (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Treasurer

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Fiona Ma (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Controller

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Malia Cohen


Endorsed by

California Superintendent of Public Instruction

Choose One (non-partisan race)State  

Tony Thurmond (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California State Board of Equalization District 2

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Sally Lieber


Endorsed by

California Commissioner of Insurance

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Ricardo Lara (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California State Assembly District 14

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Buffy Wicks (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Judges

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Martin J. Jenkins (Incumbent)

Jenkins was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2020.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Joshua Groban (Incumbent)

Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Goodwin Liu (Incumbent)

Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Carin Fujisaki (Incumbent)

Fujisaki was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Ioana Petrou (Incumbent)

Petrou was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Teri L. Jackson (Incumbent)

Jackson was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2019 and serves as the presiding justice.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Tracie L. Brown (Incumbent)

Brown was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Gordon Burns (Incumbent)

Burns was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Alison M. Tucher (Incumbent)

Tucher was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Patricia Guerrero (Incumbent)

Guerrero was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Victor Rodriguez (Incumbent)

Rodriguez was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Therese M. Stewart (Incumbent)

Stewart was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2014.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Jeremy Goldman (Incumbent)

Goldman was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.


Yes

Endorsed by

Local Races

Mayor of Oakland

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Sheng Thao


Endorsed by

Alameda County Board of Supervisors District 3

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Rebecca Kaplan


Endorsed by

Alameda County District Attorney

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Pamela Price


Endorsed by

AC Transit District Board of Directors

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Alfred Twu


Endorsed by

East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors Ward 3

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Marguerite Young (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors Ward 7

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Matt Turner


Endorsed by

Peralta Community College District board of trustees Area 3

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Louis Quindlen


Endorsed by

Peralta Community College District board of trustees Area 5

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Saleem Gilmore


Endorsed by

Peralta Community College District board of trustees Area 7

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Seth Steward


Endorsed by

Oakland City Auditor

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Courtney Ruby (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Measures and Propositions

Alameda County Ballot Measures

Measure DAlameda County, California, Measure D, Floor Area Ratio Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas.
"No" Recommended by

California State Ballot Measures

Proposition 1California Proposition 1: California Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution.
Proposition 26California Proposition 26: Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos.
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 27California Proposition 27: Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California.
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 28California Proposition 28: Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
  • require an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98;
  • distribute a portion of the additional funding based on a local education agency's share of economically disadvantaged students; and
  • require schools with 500 or more students to use 80% of the funding for employing teachers and 20% to training and materials.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98.
"No" Recommended by
Proposition 29California Proposition 29: Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 30California Proposition 30: Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 31California Proposition 31: California Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)

 A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. 
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"

Oakland City/Town Ballot Measures

Measure QOakland, California, Measure Q, Low-Rent Residential Units Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units.
Measure ROakland, California, Measure R, Removal of Gender-Specific Language Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language.
Measure TOakland, California, Measure T, Progressive Business Tax Rates Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes.
Measure UOakland, California, Measure U, Public Facilities Bond Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value.
Measure VOakland, California, Measure V, Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments.
Measure WOakland, California, Measure W, Election Campaign Funding Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported amending the Oakland Municipal Code and City Charter to establish public funding for candidate election campaigns, increasing transparency for spending on city elections, restricting former city officials from lobbying, and providing resources for the Public Ethics Commission.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed amending the Oakland Municipal Code and City Charter to establish public funding for candidate election campaigns, increasing transparency for spending on city elections, restricting former city officials from lobbying, and providing resources for the Public Ethics Commission.
Measure XOakland, California, Measure X, Charter Amendments Measure (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor.
Measure YOakland, California, Measure Y, Zoo Parcel Tax (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep.
"No" Recommended by

Oakland Unified School District School District Ballot Measures

Measure HOakland Unified School District, California, Measure H, School Maintenance Parcel Tax (November 2022)

 A yes vote supported renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance.
Back to Top

Your vote matters!