Political Affiliation: Democrat. Appointed by Gov. Doug Ducey (R), filling a vacancy created by Judge Scott Rash's confirmation to the federal bench.
Has been serving as a court commissioner hearing uncontested cases involving divorces, child support, and probate matters, since 2013.
Yes
Pima County Superior Court Division 17 - Retention
Proposition 128Arizona Legislative Changes to Ballot Initiatives with Invalid Provisions Amendment (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to allow the Arizona State Legislature to amend or repeal voter-approved ballot initiatives if any portion has been declared unconstitutional or illegal by the Arizona Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court.
A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment, thus continuing to require the Arizona State Legislature to propose a ballot measure to amend or repeal a voter-approved ballot initiative, including in cases where part of the initiative has been declared invalid.
A "yes" vote supported allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications (including property tax exemptions for widows and widowers; those with total and permanent disabilities; disabled veterans; and property used for trade, business, or agriculture) and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
A "no" vote opposed allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
Proposition 209Arizona Interest Rate Limit on Debt from Healthcare Services and Collection Exempt Property and Earnings Increase Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported:
setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and
increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.
A "no" vote opposed:
setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and
increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.
A "yes" vote supported requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources, defined as the persons or businesses that earned the money being spent.
A "no" vote opposed requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources.
