U.S. House Arizona District 7 (Pima County Tucson 85713) | AZ Ballot

U.S. House Arizona District 7 (Pima County Tucson 85713)

Federal Races

Representative, U.S. House Arizona District 7

Choose OneFederal

U.S. Senate Arizona

Choose OneFederal

(Dem)Mark Kelly (Incumbent)

Endorsed by

State Races

Governor of Arizona

Choose OneState

Attorney General of Arizona

Choose OneState

Arizona Secretary of State

Choose OneState

Arizona Treasurer

Choose OneState

(Dem)Martin Quezada

Endorsed by

Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction

Choose OneState

Arizona Corporation Commission

Choose TwoState

(Dem)Sandra D. Kennedy (Incumbent)

Endorsed by

Christina Gibson

Independent

Arizona State Mine Inspector

Choose OneState

(Dem)Trista di Genova

Write-In-Candidate

Arizona State Senate District 20

Choose OneState

(Dem)Eric Perkins

Write-In-Candidate

Arizona House of Representatives District 20

Choose TwoState

(Dem)Alma Hernandez (Incumbent)

Endorsed by

Judges

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState

Ann Timmer (Incumbent)

Timmer was appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Brewer (R) in 2012 and was retained by voters in 2016.

Yes

Endorsed by

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState

Bill Montgomery (Incumbent)

Leans Right. Montgomery was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019.

No

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState

James P. Beene (Incumbent)

Beene was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019. He received a partisanship confidence score of Mild Republican.

No

Endorsed by

Indivisible Tucson Action Alliance

Local Races

Pima County Clerk of the Superior Court

Choose One Local

(Dem)Gary Harrison (Incumbent)

Endorsed by

Pima Community College District 2

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local

Theresa Riel

Endorsed by

Tucson Education Association

Tucson Unified School District Governing Board At-large

Choose Two (non-partisan race) Local

Jennifer Eckstrom

Endorsed by

William Soland

Endorsed by

Pima County Superior Court Division 22 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Jeffrey Bergin (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Hull (R)

No

Pima County Superior Court Division 4 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Janet Calkins Bostwick (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R)

No

Pima County Superior Court Division 27 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Christopher Browning (Incumbent)

Yes

Pima County Superior Court Division 15 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Javier Chon-Lopez (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Janet Napolitano (D)

Yes

Pima County Superior Court Division 2 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Alan Goodwin (Incumbent)

Republican. Appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R).

No

Pima County Superior Court Division 13 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Peter Hochuli (Incumbent)

Leans Right

No

Pima County Superior Court Division 21 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Cynthia Kuhn (Incumbent)

Leans Right

No

Pima County Superior Court Division 6 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Danelle B. Liwski (Incumbent)

Leans Right

No

Pima County Superior Court Division 10 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

James Erik Marner (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Hull (R)

No

Pima County Superior Court Division 19 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Kathleen Ann Quigley (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Brewer (R).

No

Pima County Superior Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Laurie San Angelo (Incumbent)

Political Affiliation: Democrat. Appointed by Gov. Doug Ducey (R), filling a vacancy created by Judge Scott Rash's confirmation to the federal bench. Has been serving as a court commissioner hearing uncontested cases involving divorces, child support, and probate matters, since 2013.

Yes

Pima County Superior Court Division 17 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or No Local

Catherine Woods (Incumbent)

Leans Right

No

Measures and Propositions

Arizona State Ballot Measures

Proposition 128Arizona Legislative Changes to Ballot Initiatives with Invalid Provisions Amendment (2022)

	A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to allow the Arizona State Legislature to amend or repeal voter-approved ballot initiatives if any portion has been declared unconstitutional or illegal by the Arizona Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court.
	A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment, thus continuing to require the Arizona State Legislature to propose a ballot measure to amend or repeal a voter-approved ballot initiative, including in cases where part of the initiative has been declared invalid.
	"No" Recommended by Arizona Education Association (AEA) Arizona AFL-CIO Chispa AZ Civic Engagement Beyond Voting Indivisible Tucson Action Alliance League of Women Voters Arizona LUCHA - Living United for Change in Arizona Maricopa County Democratic Party Mi Familia Vota Mormon Women for Ethical Government One Arizona Our Voice Our Vote Rural Arizona Engagement Save Our Schools (SOS) Arizona Sierra Club Grand Canyon Stand for Children Arizona Tucson Education Association Common Defense Equality Arizona

Proposition 130Arizona Property Tax Exemptions Amendment (2022)

	A "yes" vote supported allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications (including property tax exemptions for widows and widowers; those with total and permanent disabilities; disabled veterans; and property used for trade, business, or agriculture) and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
	"Yes" Recommended by American Legion Chispa AZ Maricopa County Democratic Party
	A "no" vote opposed allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
	"No" Recommended by Civic Engagement Beyond Voting Indivisible Tucson Action Alliance

Proposition 209Arizona Interest Rate Limit on Debt from Healthcare Services and Collection Exempt Property and Earnings Increase Initiative (2022)

	A "yes" vote supported: setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.
	"Yes" Recommended by Arizona Education Association (AEA) Case Action Civic Engagement Beyond Voting Indivisible Tucson Action Alliance LUCHA - Living United for Change in Arizona Maricopa County Democratic Party Our Voice Our Vote Peoples Defense Initiative Rural Arizona Action Tucson Education Association Workers United (An SEIU Affiliate) Equality Arizona Healthcare Rising Arizona
	A "no" vote opposed: setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.

Proposition 211Arizona Campaign Finance Sources Disclosure Initiative (2022)

	A "yes" vote supported requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources, defined as the persons or businesses that earned the money being spent.
	"Yes" Recommended by Civic Engagement Beyond Voting Every District Indivisible Tucson Action Alliance League of Women Voters Arizona Maricopa County Democratic Party Save Our Schools (SOS) Arizona Sierra Club Grand Canyon Tucson Education Association Common Defense
	A "no" vote opposed requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources.

Your vote matters!