Federal Races
Representative, U.S. House California District 15
Choose OneFederal
U.S. Senate California
Choose OneFederal
(Dem)Alex Padilla (Incumbent)
This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023
U.S. Senate California - Special
Choose OneFederal
State Races
Governor of California
Choose OneState
Lieutenant Governor of California
Choose OneState
Attorney General of California
Choose OneState
California Secretary of State
Choose OneState
California Treasurer
Choose OneState
California Controller
Choose OneState
California Superintendent of Public Instruction
Choose One (non-partisan race)State
California State Board of Equalization District 2
Choose OneState
California Commissioner of Insurance
Choose OneState
California State Assembly District 19
Choose OneState
Judges
California Supreme Court - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Martin J. Jenkins (Incumbent)
Jenkins was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2020.
Yes
California Supreme Court - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Joshua Groban (Incumbent)
Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.
Yes
California Supreme Court - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Goodwin Liu (Incumbent)
Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat
Yes
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Teri L. Jackson (Incumbent)
Jackson was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2019 and serves as the presiding justice.
Yes
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Alison M. Tucher (Incumbent)
Tucher was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.
Yes
California Supreme Court - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Patricia Guerrero (Incumbent)
Guerrero was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.
Yes
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Victor Rodriguez (Incumbent)
Rodriguez was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.
Yes
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Therese M. Stewart (Incumbent)
Stewart was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2014.
Yes
California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Measures and Propositions
California State Ballot Measures
|
A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives. |
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution. |
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos. | |
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos. |
|
|
"no opinion" | |
|
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting. | |
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California. |
|
|
"no opinion" | |
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98. | |
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. |
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. | |
|
|
"no opinion" | |
|
|
A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs. |
|
|
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs. | |
|
|
"no opinion" | |
|
|
A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products. |
|
|
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. | |
|
|
"no opinion" | |
|
South San Francisco City/Town Ballot Measures
A "yes" vote supported authorizing South San Francisco to develop, construct, and acquire affordable, decent, and safe rental housing for low-income people, in an amount up to 1% of the total number of existing housing units in the South San Francisco for an 8 year period. | |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing South San Francisco to develop, construct, and acquire affordable, decent, and safe rental housing for low-income people. |
A "yes" vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $2.50 per square foot of parcel size on commercial office parcels, with revenue going towards funding early learning and childcare of families living and working in the South San Francisco Unified School District. | |
A "no" vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $2.50 per square foot of parcel size on commercial office parcels. |
Your vote matters!