U.S. House California District 3 Placer County/Roseville

Carreras electorales federales

Representative, U.S. House California District 3

Seleccione UnoFederal  

U.S. Senate California

Seleccione UnoFederal  

Esta contienda electoral es para el próximo periodo completo de seis años para el escaño en el Senado de EE.UU.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023


Respaldo político de

U.S. Senate California - Special

Seleccione UnoFederal  

Esta contienda electoral especial es para el periodo restante para ocupar el escaño vacante en el Senado de la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This is to fill the balance of V.P. Harris' vacated seat until 1/2023


Respaldo político de

Carreras electorales estatales

Governor of California

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Gavin Newsom (Titular)


Respaldo político de

Lieutenant Governor of California

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

Attorney General of California

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Rob Bonta (Titular)


Respaldo político de

California Secretary of State

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Shirley Weber (Titular)


Respaldo político de

California Treasurer

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California Controller

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California Superintendent of Public Instruction

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Estatal  

California State Board of Equalization District 1

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California Commissioner of Insurance

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California State Senate District 6

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California State Assembly District 5

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

Elección de juezas/jueces

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Joshua Groban (Titular)

Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.


SI

Respaldo político de

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Goodwin Liu (Titular)

Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat


SI

Respaldo político de

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Harry Hull (Titular)

Hull was appointed to the court by Gov. Pete Wilson (R) in 1998 and was retained by voters in 2010.


SI

Respaldo político de

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Peter Krause (Titular)

Krause was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


SI

Respaldo político de

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Laurie M. Earl (Titular)

Earl was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2021.


SI

Respaldo político de

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Stacy Boulware Eurie (Titular)


SI

Respaldo político de

Medidas y Proposiciones

California Medidas Electorales

Proposition 1California Proposition 1: California Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives.
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution.
Proposition 26California Proposition 26: Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos.
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 27California Proposition 27: Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting.
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 28California Proposition 28: Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
  • require an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98;
  • distribute a portion of the additional funding based on a local education agency's share of economically disadvantaged students; and
  • require schools with 500 or more students to use 80% of the funding for employing teachers and 20% to training and materials.
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98.
"No" Recomendado por
Proposition 29California Proposition 29: Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"sin opinión"
Proposition 30California Proposition 30: Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 31California Proposition 31: California Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)

A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. 
"No" Recomendado por
"sin opinión"

Roseville Ciudad/Pueblo Medidas Electorales

Measure CCity of Roseville – Measure C
A yes vote supported increasing the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% for general city services.
A no vote opposed increasing the transient occupancy tax from 6% to 10% for general city services.
Volver a arriba

Y¡Su voto importa!