{Want a ride to your polling place?}{Want a  ride?}

Click here
Rideshare 2 Vote logo image.

U.S. House Arizona District 7 (Pima County Tucson 85745)

Federal Races

Representative, U.S. House Arizona District 7

Select OneFederal  

U.S. Senate Arizona

Select OneFederal  

State Races

Governor of Arizona

Select OneState  

Attorney General of Arizona

Select OneState  

Arizona Secretary of State

Select OneState  

Arizona Treasurer

Select OneState  

Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction

Select OneState  

Arizona Corporation Commission

Select TwoState  

Arizona State Mine Inspector

Select OneState  

(Dem)Trista di Genova

Write-In-Candidate


Arizona State Senate District 20

Select OneState  

Arizona House of Representatives District 20

Select TwoState  

Judges

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Ann Timmer (Incumbent)

Timmer was appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Brewer (R) in 2012 and was retained by voters in 2016.


No

Endorsed by

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Bill Montgomery (Incumbent)

Leans Right. Montgomery was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019.


No

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

James P. Beene (Incumbent)

Beene was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019. He received a partisanship confidence score of Mild Republican.


No

Endorsed by

Local Races

Pima County Clerk of the Superior Court

Select OneLocal  

Tucson Unified School District Governing Board At-large

Select Two (non-partisan race)Local  

Pima County Superior Court Division 22 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Jeffrey Bergin (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Hull (R)


No

Pima County Superior Court Division 4 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Janet Calkins Bostwick (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R)


No

Pima County Superior Court Division 27 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Christopher Browning (Incumbent)


Yes

Pima County Superior Court Division 15 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Javier Chon-Lopez (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Janet Napolitano (D)


Yes

Pima County Superior Court Division 2 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Alan Goodwin (Incumbent)

Republican. Appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R).


No

Pima County Superior Court Division 13 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Peter Hochuli (Incumbent)

Leans Right


No

Pima County Superior Court Division 21 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Cynthia Kuhn (Incumbent)

Leans Right


No

Pima County Superior Court Division 6 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Danelle B. Liwski (Incumbent)

Leans Right


No

Pima County Superior Court Division 10 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

James Erik Marner (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Hull (R)


No

Pima County Superior Court Division 19 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Kathleen Ann Quigley (Incumbent)

Appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Brewer (R).


No

Pima County Superior Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Laurie San Angelo (Incumbent)

Political Affiliation: Democrat. Appointed by Gov. Doug Ducey (R), filling a vacancy created by Judge Scott Rash's confirmation to the federal bench. Has been serving as a court commissioner hearing uncontested cases involving divorces, child support, and probate matters, since 2013.


Yes

Pima County Superior Court Division 17 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal  

Catherine Woods (Incumbent)

Leans Right


No

Measures and Propositions

Arizona State Ballot Measures

Proposition 128Arizona Legislative Changes to Ballot Initiatives with Invalid Provisions Amendment (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to allow the Arizona State Legislature to amend or repeal voter-approved ballot initiatives if any portion has been declared unconstitutional or illegal by the Arizona Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court.

A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment, thus continuing to require the Arizona State Legislature to propose a ballot measure to amend or repeal a voter-approved ballot initiative, including in cases where part of the initiative has been declared invalid.
Proposition 130Arizona Property Tax Exemptions Amendment (2022)

A "yes" vote supported allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications (including property tax exemptions for widows and widowers; those with total and permanent disabilities; disabled veterans; and property used for trade, business, or agriculture) and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
A "no" vote opposed allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
Proposition 209Arizona Interest Rate Limit on Debt from Healthcare Services and Collection Exempt Property and Earnings Increase Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported:
  • setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and 
  • increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.
A "no" vote opposed:
  • setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and 
  • increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.
Proposition 211Arizona Campaign Finance Sources Disclosure Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources, defined as the persons or businesses that earned the money being spent.
A "no" vote opposed requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources.
Back to Top

Your vote matters!