{¿Quiere que lo lleve a su lugar de votación?}{¿Quiere un paseo?}
Click here
{¿Quiere que lo lleve a su lugar de votación?}{¿Quiere un paseo?}
Click here
Elija UnoFederal
Elija UnoFederal
This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023
Elija UnoEstatal 
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Estatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Jackson was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2019 and serves as the presiding justice.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Guerrero was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Rodriguez was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
|
|
A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution. |
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting. |
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98. |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A yes vote supported authorizing a special tax of up to $50 annually with revenue dedicated to maintenance and landscaping activities in the Crockett Community Services District. |
|
|
A no vote opposed authorizing a special tax of up to $50 annually with revenue dedicated to maintenance and landscaping activities in the Crockett Community Services District. |
|
|
A yes vote supported setting the appropriations limit for the fiscal year of 2022-2023 for the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District at $5,399,362.00 and using this amount for fiscal years 2023-2024 through 2026-2027. |
|
|
A no vote opposed setting the appropriations limit for the fiscal year of 2022-2023 for the Kensington Police Protection and Community Services District at $5,399,362.00 and using this amount for fiscal years 2023-2024 through 2026-2027. |
Y¡Su voto importa!
