Federal Races

Representative, U.S. House California District 7

Choose OneFederal  

(Dem)Doris Matsui (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

U.S. Senate California

Choose OneFederal  

This race is for the next full, six-year term for the U.S Senate seat.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Incumbent)

This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023


Endorsed by

U.S. Senate California - Special

Choose OneFederal  

This special race is for the remainder of the term to fill VP Kamala Harris's vacated Senate seat.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Incumbent)

This is to fill the balance of V.P. Harris' vacated seat until 1/2023


Endorsed by

State Races

Governor of California

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Gavin Newsom (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Lieutenant Governor of California

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Eleni Kounalakis (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Attorney General of California

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Rob Bonta (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Secretary of State

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Shirley Weber (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Treasurer

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Fiona Ma (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Controller

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Malia Cohen


Endorsed by

California Superintendent of Public Instruction

Choose One (non-partisan race)State  

Tony Thurmond (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California State Board of Equalization District 1

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Jose Altamirano


Endorsed by

California Commissioner of Insurance

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Ricardo Lara (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California State Senate District 8

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Dave Jones


Endorsed by

California State Assembly District 6

Choose OneState  

(Dem)Kevin McCarty (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Judges

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Martin J. Jenkins (Incumbent)

Jenkins was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2020.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Joshua Groban (Incumbent)

Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Goodwin Liu (Incumbent)

Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat


Yes

Endorsed by

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Harry Hull (Incumbent)

Hull was appointed to the court by Gov. Pete Wilson (R) in 1998 and was retained by voters in 2010.


No

Endorsed by

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Peter Krause (Incumbent)

Krause was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


No

Endorsed by

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Laurie M. Earl (Incumbent)

Earl was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom in 2021.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Patricia Guerrero (Incumbent)

Guerrero was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 3rd District Court of Appeal - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Stacy Boulware Eurie (Incumbent)


No

Endorsed by

Local Races

Sacramento City Council District 1

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Lisa Kaplan


Endorsed by

Sacramento City Council District 3

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Karina Talamantes


Endorsed by

Sacramento City Council District 5

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Caity Maple


Endorsed by

Sacramento County Board of Supervisors District 5

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Jaclyn Moreno


Endorsed by

Los Rios Community College District Trustee Area 1

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Dustin Johnson (Incumbent)


Los Rios Community College District Trustee Area 2

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Robert Jones (Incumbent)


Sacramento Municipal Utility District Board District 3

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Gregg Fishman (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Sacramento Municipal Utility District Board District 4

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Rosanna Herber (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

Sacramento Suburban Water District Board District 2 - Special

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Michael Modula


Sacramento City Unified Board of Education Trustee Area 2

Choose One (non-partisan race) Local  

Jasjit Singh


Endorsed by

Measures and Propositions

California State Ballot Measures

Proposition 1California Proposition 1: California Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution.
Proposition 26California Proposition 26: Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos.
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 27California Proposition 27: Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California.
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 28California Proposition 28: Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
  • require an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98;
  • distribute a portion of the additional funding based on a local education agency's share of economically disadvantaged students; and
  • require schools with 500 or more students to use 80% of the funding for employing teachers and 20% to training and materials.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98.
"No" Recommended by
Proposition 29California Proposition 29: Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 30California Proposition 30: Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)

 A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"
Proposition 31California Proposition 31: California Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)

 A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
"Yes" Recommended by
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. 
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"

Sacramento County Ballot Measures

Measure DSacramento D

 A yes vote supported allowing the county of Sacramento and cities within the county to develop housing for low-income people and families equal to 1% of current housing units in the county.
"Yes" Recommended by
A no vote opposed allowing the county of Sacramento and cities within the county to develop housing for low-income people and families equal to 1% of current housing units in the county.

Sacramento City/Town Ballot Measures

Measure MSacramento, California, Measure M, Use of Redistricting Maps Charter Amendment (November 2022)
A yes vote supported amending the Sacramento city charter to establish that new redistricting maps shall take effect at the next-upcoming regular councilmember election.

A no vote opposed amending the Sacramento city charter to establish that new redistricting maps shall take effect at the next-upcoming regular councilmember election.
Measure NSacramento, California, Measure N, Hotel Tax Usage for Tourism Projects Measure (November 2022)
A yes vote supported allowing funds from the city's hotel tax to be used for tourism-related economic development projects.

A no vote opposed allowing funds from the city's hotel tax to be used for tourism-related economic development projects.
Measure OSacramento, California, Homeless Shelter and Encampment Measure (November 2022)
A "yes" vote supported requiring the city of Sacramento to provide shelter beds based on 60% of its homeless population and making it a criminal offense to camp in public and certain private areas if the person refuses the emergency shelter.

A "no" vote opposed requiring the city of Sacramento to provide shelter beds based on 60% of its homeless population and making it a criminal offense to camp in public and certain private areas if the person refuses the emergency shelter.
"No" Recommended by
Back to Top

Your vote matters!