Want a ride to your polling place?Want a  ride?

Click here
Rideshare 2 Vote logo image.

U.S. House Arizona District 2 (Coconino County Flagstaff 86001)

Federal Races

Representative, U.S. House Arizona District 2

Select OneFederal  

U.S. Senate Arizona

Select OneFederal  

State Races

Governor of Arizona

Select OneState  

Attorney General of Arizona

Select OneState  

Arizona Secretary of State

Select OneState  

Arizona Treasurer

Select OneState  

Arizona Superintendent of Public Instruction

Select OneState  

Arizona Corporation Commission

Select TwoState  

Arizona State Mine Inspector

Select OneState  

(Dem)Trista di Genova

Write-In-Candidate


Arizona State Senate District 7

Select OneState  

Arizona House of Representatives District 7

Select TwoState  

Judges

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Ann Timmer (Incumbent)

Timmer was appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Brewer (R) in 2012 and was retained by voters in 2016.


No

Endorsed by

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Bill Montgomery (Incumbent)

Leans Right. Montgomery was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019.


No

Arizona Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

James P. Beene (Incumbent)

Beene was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019. He received a partisanship confidence score of Mild Republican.


No

Endorsed by

Arizona Court of Appeals Division One - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Michael J. Brown (Incumbent)

Leans Left. Brown was appointed to the court by Gov. Janet Napolitano (D) in January 2007. He was retained by the voters in 2010 and 2016. Brown served as chief judge on the court from 2015 to 2017.


Yes

Arizona Court of Appeals Division One - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

D. Steven Williams (Incumbent)

Williams was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019,


No

Measures and Propositions

Arizona State Ballot Measures

Proposition 128Arizona Legislative Changes to Ballot Initiatives with Invalid Provisions Amendment (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to allow the Arizona State Legislature to amend or repeal voter-approved ballot initiatives if any portion has been declared unconstitutional or illegal by the Arizona Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court.

A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment, thus continuing to require the Arizona State Legislature to propose a ballot measure to amend or repeal a voter-approved ballot initiative, including in cases where part of the initiative has been declared invalid.
Proposition 130Arizona Property Tax Exemptions Amendment (2022)

A "yes" vote supported allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications (including property tax exemptions for widows and widowers; those with total and permanent disabilities; disabled veterans; and property used for trade, business, or agriculture) and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
A "no" vote opposed allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article.
Proposition 209Arizona Interest Rate Limit on Debt from Healthcare Services and Collection Exempt Property and Earnings Increase Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported:
  • setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and 
  • increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.
A "no" vote opposed:
  • setting a limit on interest rates for debt accrued from receiving healthcare services equal to either the weekly average one-year constant maturity treasury yield or 3%, and 
  • increasing the amount of value for certain property and earnings exempt from attachment, execution, forced sale, and any other debt collection processes.
Proposition 211Arizona Campaign Finance Sources Disclosure Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources, which would be defined as the persons or businesses that earned the money being spent.
A "no" vote opposed requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources.
Back to Top

Your vote matters!