{¿Quiere que lo lleve a su lugar de votación?}{¿Quiere un paseo?}
Click here
{¿Quiere que lo lleve a su lugar de votación?}{¿Quiere un paseo?}
Click here
Elija UnoFederal
Elija UnoFederal
This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023
Elija UnoFederal
Elija UnoEstatal 
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Estatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
Elija UnoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Jackson was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2019 and serves as the presiding justice.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Guerrero was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Rodriguez was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.
Sí
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local
|
|
A yes vote supported allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas. |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution. |
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting. |
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98. |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. |
|
|
|
|
|
"sin opinión" |
|
|
|
|
A yes vote supported allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units. |
|
|
A yes vote supported amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language. |
|
|
A yes vote supported creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes. |
|
|
A yes vote supported authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value. |
|
|
A yes vote supported amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments. |
|
|
A yes vote supported amending the Oakland Municipal Code and City Charter to establish public funding for candidate election campaigns, increasing transparency for spending on city elections, restricting former city officials from lobbying, and providing resources for the Public Ethics Commission. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed amending the Oakland Municipal Code and City Charter to establish public funding for candidate election campaigns, increasing transparency for spending on city elections, restricting former city officials from lobbying, and providing resources for the Public Ethics Commission. |
|
|
A yes vote supported changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor. |
|
|
A yes vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep. |
|
|
|
|
A yes vote supported renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance. |
|
|
|
|
|
A no vote opposed renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance. |
Y¡Su voto importa!
