Carreras electorales federales

Representative, U.S. House California District 30

Seleccione UnoFederal  

U.S. Senate California

Seleccione UnoFederal  

Esta contienda electoral es para el próximo periodo completo de seis años para el escaño en el Senado de EE.UU.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023


Respaldo político de

U.S. Senate California - Special

Seleccione UnoFederal  

Esta contienda electoral especial es para el periodo restante para ocupar el escaño vacante en el Senado de la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This is to fill the balance of V.P. Harris' vacated seat until 1/2023


Respaldo político de

Carreras electorales estatales

Governor of California

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Gavin Newsom (Titular)


Respaldo político de

Lieutenant Governor of California

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

Attorney General of California

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Rob Bonta (Titular)


Respaldo político de

California Secretary of State

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Shirley Weber (Titular)


Respaldo político de

California Treasurer

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California Controller

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California Superintendent of Public Instruction

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Estatal  

California State Board of Equalization District 3

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California Commissioner of Insurance

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California State Senate District 26

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

California State Assembly District 52

Seleccione UnoEstatal  

Elección de juezas/jueces

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

California Supreme Court - Retention

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Goodwin Liu (Titular)

Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat


SI

Respaldo político de

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Brian S. Currey (Titular)

Currey was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. The Judicial Nominees Evaluation Commission bestowed an exceptionally well qualified rating.


SI

Respaldo político de

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 8 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Elizabeth A. Grimes (Titular)

Leans Far Right


No

Respaldo político de

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 8 - Retention

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 8 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

John Shepard Wiley Jr. (Titular)

Wiley was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


SI

Respaldo político de

California Supreme Court - Retention

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 1 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Frances Rothschild (Titular)

Rothschild was appointed to the court by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) in 2005 and serves as the presiding justice of the 2nd District Division 1 court.


SI

Respaldo político de

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Audrey Collins (Titular)

Collins was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2014. She received an exceptionally well qualified rating from the Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.


SI

Respaldo político de

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Lamar W. Baker (Titular)

Baker was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2015. He served as a Deputy Assistant Attorney General at the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Policy in Washington, D.C from 2012-2013.


SI

Respaldo político de

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 7 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

John Segal (Titular)

Segal was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2015.


SI

Respaldo político de

California 2nd District Court of Appeal Division 6 - Retention

¿Continuidad de este juez en el cargo? Seleccione Sí o NoEstatal  

Hernaldo Baltodano (Titular)

Baltodano was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2017.


SI

Respaldo político de

Carreras electorales locales

Mayor of Los Angeles

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles City Attorney

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles City Controller

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles City Council District 5

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles City Council District 11

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

Los Angeles City Council District 13

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles City Council District 15

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles County Sheriff

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Office 60

Seleccione Uno Jueza/Juez (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Office 67

Seleccione Uno Jueza/Juez (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Office 70

Seleccione Uno Jueza/Juez (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Office 90

Seleccione Uno Jueza/Juez (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Office 118

Seleccione Uno Jueza/Juez (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Office 151

Seleccione Uno Jueza/Juez (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles Community College Board of Trustees Seat No. 2

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles Community College Board of Trustees Seat No. 4

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles Community College Board of Trustees Seat No. 6

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Los Angeles Community College Board of Trustees Seat No. 7 - Special

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Las Virgenes Municipal Water District District 3

 No ha seleccionado a ningún candidato

West Basin Municipal Water District District 1

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Harold Williams (Titular)


Respaldo político de

West Basin Municipal Water District District 4

Seleccione Uno (Contiendas electorales apartidistas)Local  

Medidas y Proposiciones

California Medidas Electorales

Proposition 1California Proposition 1: California Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives.
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution.
Proposition 26California Proposition 26: Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 27California Proposition 27: Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 28California Proposition 28: Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
  • require an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98;
  • distribute a portion of the additional funding based on a local education agency's share of economically disadvantaged students; and
  • require schools with 500 or more students to use 80% of the funding for employing teachers and 20% to training and materials.
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98.
"No" Recomendado por
Proposition 29California Proposition 29: Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"sin opinión"
Proposition 30California Proposition 30: Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.

A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 31California Proposition 31: California Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)

A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. 
"No" Recomendado por
"sin opinión"

Los Angeles County Medidas Electorales

Measure ALos Angeles County, California, Measure A, Removal of Sheriff for Cause Amendment (November 2022)

A "yes" vote supported allowing the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, by a four-fifths vote, to remove the sheriff from office for cause, which is defined to include: violation of laws related to the sheriff's duties; repeated neglect of the sheriff's duties; misuse of public funds or properties; willful falsification of documents; or obstruction of an investigation into the department's conduct.  
A "no" vote opposed allowing the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors, by a four-fifths vote, to remove the sheriff from office for cause.
Volver a arriba

Y¡Su voto importa!