{Want a ride to your polling place?}{Want a ride?}
Click here
{Want a ride to your polling place?}{Want a ride?}
Click here
Select OneFederal
Select OneFederal
Select OneState 
Select OneState
Select OneState
Select OneState
Select OneState
Select TwoState
Select OneState
Select OneState
Select TwoState
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Timmer was appointed to the court by Gov. Jan Brewer (R) in 2012 and was retained by voters in 2016.
No
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Leans Right. Montgomery was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019.
No
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState
Beene was appointed to the court by Gov. Doug Ducey (R) in 2019. He received a partisanship confidence score of Mild Republican.
No
Select OneLocal
Select One JudgeLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
Political Affiliation: Democrat. Appointed by Gov. Doug Ducey (R), filling a vacancy created by Judge Scott Rash's confirmation to the federal bench. Has been serving as a court commissioner hearing uncontested cases involving divorces, child support, and probate matters, since 2013.
No
Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoLocal
|
|
A "yes" vote supported this constitutional amendment to allow the Arizona State Legislature to amend or repeal voter-approved ballot initiatives if any portion has been declared unconstitutional or illegal by the Arizona Supreme Court or U.S. Supreme Court. |
|
|
A "no" vote opposed this constitutional amendment, thus continuing to require the Arizona State Legislature to propose a ballot measure to amend or repeal a voter-approved ballot initiative, including in cases where part of the initiative has been declared invalid. |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications (including property tax exemptions for widows and widowers; those with total and permanent disabilities; disabled veterans; and property used for trade, business, or agriculture) and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed allowing the legislature to set certain property tax exemption amounts and qualifications and consolidating the constitution's property tax exemption provisions into a single article. |
|
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported:
|
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed:
|
|
|
A "yes" vote supported requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources, defined as the persons or businesses that earned the money being spent. |
|
|
|
|
|
A "no" vote opposed requiring that persons or entities that make an independent expenditure of $50,000 or more on a statewide campaign or $25,000 or more on a local campaign must disclose the names of the money's original sources. |
Your vote matters!
