{¿Quiere que lo lleve a su lugar de votación?}{¿Quiere un paseo?}

Click here
Rideshare 2 Vote logo image.

U.S. House California District 12 (Alameda County Oakland 94607)

Carreras electorales federales

Representative, U.S. House California District 12

Elija UnoFederal  

U.S. Senate California

Elija UnoFederal  

Esta contienda es para el término completo de 6 años para el escaño de Senador de los Estados Unidos.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023


Respaldado por

U.S. Senate California - Special

Elija UnoFederal  

Esta es una contienda para completar el resto del mandato de Senador que la vicepresidenta Kamala Harris dejó vacante

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Titular)

This is to fill the balance of V.P. Harris' vacated seat until 1/2023


Respaldado por

Carreras electorales estatales

Governor of California

Elija UnoEstatal  

Lieutenant Governor of California

Elija UnoEstatal  

Attorney General of California

Elija UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Rob Bonta (Titular)


Respaldado por

California Secretary of State

Elija UnoEstatal  

(Dem)Shirley Weber (Titular)


Respaldado por

California Treasurer

Elija UnoEstatal  

California Controller

Elija UnoEstatal  

California Superintendent of Public Instruction

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Estatal  

California State Board of Equalization District 2

Elija UnoEstatal  

California Commissioner of Insurance

Elija UnoEstatal  

California State Assembly District 18

Elija UnoEstatal  

Elección de juezas/jueces

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Joshua Groban (Titular)

Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.


Respaldado por

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Goodwin Liu (Titular)

Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Carin Fujisaki (Titular)

Fujisaki was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Ioana Petrou (Titular)

Petrou was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Teri L. Jackson (Titular)

Jackson was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2019 and serves as the presiding justice.


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Tracie L. Brown (Titular)

Brown was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 5 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Gordon Burns (Titular)

Burns was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018.


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Alison M. Tucher (Titular)

Tucher was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.


Respaldado por

California Supreme Court - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Victor Rodriguez (Titular)

Rodriguez was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021.


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Therese M. Stewart (Titular)

Stewart was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2014.


Respaldado por

California 1st District Court of Appeal Division 4 - Retention

¿Que este juez continúe en al cargo? Elija Sí o NoEstatal  

Jeremy Goldman (Titular)

Goldman was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.


Respaldado por

Carreras electorales locales

Mayor of Oakland

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

Alameda County Board of Supervisors District 3

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

Alameda County District Attorney

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

AC Transit District Board of Directors

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors Ward 3

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

East Bay Municipal Utility District Board of Directors Ward 7

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

Peralta Community College District board of trustees Area 3

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

Peralta Community College District board of trustees Area 5

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

Peralta Community College District board of trustees Area 7

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

Oakland City Auditor

Elija Uno (carrera no partidista)Local  

Medidas y Proposiciones

Alameda County Propuestas incluídas en la boleta

Measure DAlameda County, California, Measure D, Floor Area Ratio Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas.
A no vote opposed allowing a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for agricultural buildings in Large Parcel Agriculture areas and a maximum floor area ratio of .025 for covered equestrian riding arenas in Large Parcel Agriculture and Resource Management areas.
"No" Recomendado por

California Estado Propuestas incluídas en la boleta

Proposition 1California Proposition 1: California Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives.
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution.
Proposition 26California Proposition 26: Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 27California Proposition 27: Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 28California Proposition 28: Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
  • require an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98;
  • distribute a portion of the additional funding based on a local education agency's share of economically disadvantaged students; and
  • require schools with 500 or more students to use 80% of the funding for employing teachers and 20% to training and materials.

A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98.
"No" Recomendado por
Proposition 29California Proposition 29: Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"sin opinión"
Proposition 30California Proposition 30: Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"sin opinión"
Proposition 31California Proposition 31: California Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)

A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. 
"No" Recomendado por
"sin opinión"

Oakland Ciudad/Pueblo Propuestas incluídas en la boleta

Measure QOakland, California, Measure Q, Low-Rent Residential Units Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units.
A no vote opposed allowing Oakland to establish 13,000 low-rent residential units.
Measure ROakland, California, Measure R, Removal of Gender-Specific Language Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language.
A no vote opposed amending the city charter to remove gender-specific language.
Measure TOakland, California, Measure T, Progressive Business Tax Rates Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes.
A no vote opposed creating a progressive tax rate structure for business taxes.
Measure UOakland, California, Measure U, Public Facilities Bond Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value.
A no vote opposed authorizing the city of Oakland to issue $850,000,000 in bonds with bond revenue going to fund public facilities and requiring an estimated property tax levy of $71 per $100,000 in assessed value.
Measure VOakland, California, Measure V, Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments.
A no vote opposed amending the "Just Cause for Eviction Ordinance" to prohibit no-fault evictions for children and educators during the school year, extend eviction protections, and clarify other amendments.
Measure WOakland, California, Measure W, Election Campaign Funding Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported amending the Oakland Municipal Code and City Charter to establish public funding for candidate election campaigns, increasing transparency for spending on city elections, restricting former city officials from lobbying, and providing resources for the Public Ethics Commission.
A no vote opposed amending the Oakland Municipal Code and City Charter to establish public funding for candidate election campaigns, increasing transparency for spending on city elections, restricting former city officials from lobbying, and providing resources for the Public Ethics Commission.
Measure XOakland, California, Measure X, Charter Amendments Measure (November 2022)

A yes vote supported changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor.
A no vote opposed changing the city charter to establish term limits for councilmembers, requiring two hearings before allowing the council to place measures on the ballot, counting absent councilmembers as "no" votes when determining if the mayor can break a tie, giving the Public Ethics Commission discretion for establishing councilmembers' salaries, allowing the Public Ethics Commission to set the salaries of the city attorney and auditor, and detailing the duties of the auditor.

Measure YOakland, California, Measure Y, Zoo Parcel Tax (November 2022)
A yes vote supported authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep.
A no vote opposed authorizing an annual parcel tax of $68 per parcel for 20 years for zoo upkeep.
"No" Recomendado por

Oakland Unified School District School District Propuestas incluídas en la boleta

Measure HOakland Unified School District, California, Measure H, School Maintenance Parcel Tax (November 2022)

A yes vote supported renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance.
A no vote opposed renewing an annual parcel tax of $120 per parcel for 14 years for school maintenance.
Ir arriba

Y¡Su voto importa!