{Want a ride to your polling place?}{Want a  ride?}

Click here
Rideshare 2 Vote logo image.

U.S. House California District 40 (Orange County Yorba Linda 92886)

Federal Races

Representative, U.S. House California District 40

Select OneFederal  

U.S. Senate California

Select OneFederal  

This race is for the next full, six-year term for the U.S Senate seat.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Incumbent)

This vote is for Alex Padilla to serve a full term in the Senate beginning 1/2023


Endorsed by

U.S. Senate California - Special

Select OneFederal  

This special race is for the remainder of the term to fill VP Kamala Harris's vacated Senate seat.

(Dem)Alex Padilla (Incumbent)

This is to fill the balance of V.P. Harris' vacated seat until 1/2023


Endorsed by

State Races

Governor of California

Select OneState  

Lieutenant Governor of California

Select OneState  

Attorney General of California

Select OneState  

(Dem)Rob Bonta (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Secretary of State

Select OneState  

(Dem)Shirley Weber (Incumbent)


Endorsed by

California Treasurer

Select OneState  

California Controller

Select OneState  

California Superintendent of Public Instruction

Select One (non-partisan race)State  

California State Board of Equalization District 4

Select OneState  

California Commissioner of Insurance

Select OneState  

California State Senate District 32

Select OneState  

California State Assembly District 59

Select OneState  

Judges

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Joshua Groban (Incumbent)

Groban was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. Groban received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Goodwin Liu (Incumbent)

Liu was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2011. He received a partisanship confidence score of Strong Democrat


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 1 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Judith McConnell (Incumbent)

McConnell was appointed to the court by Gov. Gray Davis (D) in 2001 and retained by voters in 2010. She is the presiding justice.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Manuel Ramirez (Incumbent)

Ramirez was appointed to the court by Gov. George Deukmejian (R) in 1990 and was retained by voters in 2010.


No

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Carol D. Codrington (Incumbent)

Codrington was appointed to the court by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) in 2010 and was retained by voters for a 12-year term.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Michael J. Raphael (Incumbent)

Raphael was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. He received an exceptionally well qualified rating from the Judicial Nominees Evaluation Commission.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 2 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Frank J. Menetrez (Incumbent)

Menetrez was appointed to the court by Gov. Jerry Brown (D) in 2018. He was rated exceptionally well qualified by the state bar Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Kathleen O'Leary (Incumbent)

O'Leary was appointed to the court by Gov. Gray Davis (D) in 2000. She was rated exceptionally well qualified by the state bar Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

William Bedsworth (Incumbent)

Bedsworth was appointed to the court by Gov. Pete Wilson (R) in 1997. The Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation of the state Bar rated him exceptionally well qualified.


No

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Eileen Moore (Incumbent)

Moore was appointed to the court by Gov. Gray Davis (D) in 2000. She was retained by voters in 2002 and 2010.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 1 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Truc Do (Incumbent)

Do was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2020.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Maurice Sanchez (Incumbent)

Sanchez was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2021. He was rated exceptionally well qualified for the position by the Commission of the California State Bar on Judicial Nominees Evaluation.


Yes

Endorsed by

California Supreme Court - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 3 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Joanne Motoike (Incumbent)

Motoike was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022. She was rated exceptionally well qualified for the position by the Commission on Judicial Nominees Evaluation of the State Bar of California.


Yes

Endorsed by

California 4th District Court of Appeal Division 1 - Retention

Retain this Judge? Select Yes or NoState  

Martin Buchanan (Incumbent)

Buchanan was appointed to the court by Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) in 2022.


Yes

Endorsed by

Local Races

Superior Court of Orange County, Office No. 30

Select One Judge (non-partisan race)Local  

Orange County Board of Supervisors District 2

Select One (non-partisan race)Local  

Orange County Board of Supervisors District 4

Select One (non-partisan race)Local  

Orange County Board of Supervisors District 5

Select One (non-partisan race)Local  

Measures and Propositions

California State Ballot Measures

Proposition 1California Proposition 1: California Right to Reproductive Freedom Amendment (2022)

A "yes" vote supported amending the state constitution to prohibit the state from interfering with or denying an individual's reproductive freedom, which is defined to include a right to an abortion and a right to contraceptives.
A "no" vote opposed this amendment providing a right to reproductive freedom in the state constitution.
Proposition 26California Proposition 26: Legalize Sports Betting on American Indian Lands Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to (i) legalize sports betting at American Indian gaming casinos and licensed racetracks in California; (ii) tax profits derived from sports betting at racetracks at 10%; and (iii) legalize roulette and dice games, such as craps, at tribal casinos.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California and roulette and dice games at tribal casinos.
"no opinion"
Proposition 27California Proposition 27: Legalize Sports Betting and Revenue for Homelessness Prevention Fund Initiative (2022)
A "yes" vote supported legalizing online and mobile sports betting for persons 21 years of age or older, establishing regulations for the mobile sports betting industry, imposing a 10% tax on sports betting revenues and licensing fees, and allocating tax revenue to an account for homelessness programs and an account for tribes not operating sports betting.

A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative, thus continuing to prohibit sports betting in California.
"no opinion"
Proposition 28California Proposition 28: Art and Music K-12 Education Funding Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to:
  • require an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98;
  • distribute a portion of the additional funding based on a local education agency's share of economically disadvantaged students; and
  • require schools with 500 or more students to use 80% of the funding for employing teachers and 20% to training and materials.
A "no" vote opposed requiring an annual source of funding for K-12 public schools for arts and music education equal to, at minimum, 1% of the total state and local revenues that local education agencies receive under Proposition 98.
"No" Recommended by
Proposition 29California Proposition 29: Dialysis Clinic Requirements Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
A "no" vote opposed this ballot initiative to require dialysis clinics to have at least one physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant while patients are being treated; report data on dialysis-related infections; and not discriminate against patients based on the source of payment for care. 
"no opinion"
Proposition 30California Proposition 30: Tax on Income Above $2 Million for Zero-Emissions Vehicles and Wildfire Prevention Initiative (2022)

A "yes" vote supported increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
A "no" vote opposed increasing the tax on personal income above $2 million by 1.75% and dedicating the revenue to zero-emission vehicle subsidies; zero-emission vehicle infrastructure, such as electric vehicle charging stations; and wildfire suppression and prevention programs.
"no opinion"
Proposition 31California Proposition 31: California Flavored Tobacco Products Ban Referendum (2022)

A "yes" vote is to uphold the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), which would ban the sale of flavored tobacco products.
A "no" vote is to repeal the contested legislation, Senate Bill 793 (SB 793), thus keeping the sale of flavored tobacco legal in the state. 
"No" Recommended by
"no opinion"

Yorba Linda City/Town Ballot Measures

Measure ZYorba Linda, California, Measure Z, Rezoning Requirements Measure (November 2022)
A "yes" vote supported amending zoning requirements regarding the heights of housing units, including those with increased heights to meet state laws.

A "no" vote opposed amending zoning requirements regarding the heights of housing units, including those with increased heights to meet state laws.
Back to Top

Your vote matters!